| More

February 9, 2010

TechXav: Top 20 Most Popular Internet Passwords

This article from TechXav is hilarious and sad at the same time:

By Alexander Long

If you are busy maintaining your social life on Facebook, with no second thoughts on the password you have chosen, then it is time you ought to give it a change before hackers take the opportunity to break into your account.

According to Sydney-based data security firm Impreva, the most popular Internet password is “123456″, followed by “12345″ and then “123456789″. The study, which analyzes 32 million passwords recently exposed in the Rockyou.com breach, paints a grim picture of how vulnerable our online accounts are, especially those which contain simple credentials. It is quite depressing to see many people still turning a deaf ear despite a couple of hacks in the past few years.

The study also noted that people tend to use the same passwords on all or most of their online accounts, opening a big hole for hackers to easily access their targeted account. Some of the key findings include 30% of users chose passwords whose lengths is equal or below six characters (it is recommended to have a minimum of eight characters to be considered as a strong password), and almost 60% of users chose their passwords from a limited set of alpha-numeric characters, thus making them susceptible to basic forms of cyber attacks known as “brute force attacks.”

“Everyone needs to understand what the combination of poor passwords means in today’s world of automated cyber attacks. With only minimal effort, a hacker can gain access to one new account every second—or 1,000 accounts every 17 minutes,” said Imperva’s CTO Amichai Shulman.

For enterprises, password insecurity can have serious consequences. “Employees using the same passwords on Facebook that they use in the workplace bring the possibility of compromising enterprise systems with insecure passwords, especially if they are using easy to crack passwords like ‘123456’,” added Shulman.

“The problem has changed very little over the past 20 years”, he added, referring to a 1990 Unix study that showed a password selection pattern similar to what consumers select today. “It’s time for everyone to take password security seriously – it’s an important first step in data security.”

The main reason why people disregard security firms’ advice to select a strong for their online accounts is because today’s digital age requires humans to remember a lot of things. To some, it is an arduous task to keep track of many important data in our head — voice mail passwords, ATM PINs, Internet passwords, etc.

If you are one of those who have difficulty in squeezing a dozen of different passwords into your brain, then a possible solution would be to create a strong and long password for Internet bank accounts or any websites that involve money transactions or storage of personal data. For social networking or entertainment websites where stakes are much lower, you can select a password that is relatively easy to remember.

Source: http://techxav.com/2010/01/21/top-20-most-popular-internet-passwords/

The Google Super Bowl Ad Failed!

The Google Super Bowl Ad Failed!
By Grant Ryan

My recent post regarding the Video Boss to the Google Super Bowl Commercial:

I really enjoyed the Google commercial, but I don’t think it is suitable for the Super Bowl audience. An individual’s eyes have to be fixated on the screen in order for the message to come across. In all the commotion of the party I attended I completely lost track of the storyline and it wasn’t until I followed the link to this page that I understood it. I commend Google on their unique and clever ad, but it wasn’t funny. I can’t speak for everyone, but I generally want to see humorous commercials during the Super Bowl, like the Doritos’ ad with the little boy who slaps his mom’s boyfriend. I have been a user and proponent of Google since before they were an IPO, so this is just constructive criticism.



Super Bowl Ad Idea:

I realize two weeks is a limited time frame to film, but I think they could have had Peyton Manning or Drew Brees conduct their scouting report using Google and YouTube.

What do you think?

Video Boss: http://www.thevideoboss.com/posts/google-ad
Google Super Bowl Ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnsSUqgkDwU

February 8, 2010

VentureBeat: Displax forgot to tell us it doesn’t make plastic nanowire film

VentureBeat has an excellent article about Displax and Visual Planet rather than distort the content, I pasted it below:

By Dean Takahashi

One of our most popular stories in recent days has been about Displax, a company in Portugal that plans to start selling a plastic film that turns any surface into a touchscreen.

By July, Displax said it is planning to begin commercial sales of its "multitouch skin" which can be thinner than paper. The ideal is to spread a nanowire-laced plastic film over any flat or curved surface — glass, plastic or wood — so that it becomes interactive.

The problem with our interview with Miguel Fonseca, chief business officer at Displax, was that he omitted a key detail. While Displax makes the controller that enables multitouch contact with the plastic film, it doesn't make that plastic film itself.

The film is actually a product created in 2004 by Visual Planet, a London-based company. Mike Cole, commercial director at Visual Planet, contacted us and let us know that the company's ViP Interactive Foil has been shipping for a while and Displax is one of its resellers.

"I think the core message is that what they are claiming about being the first to develop a flexible foil base touch sensor is incorrect and most of the press has focused on this fact," Cole wrote in an email. "They have developed a controller only. They tied in our technology in the release so they could promote theirs and make more of a splash."

Cole said that ViP would be happy to sell its foil to Displax to be part of its "multitouch skin" solution, but there is no agreement in place right now to do so. The two companies have been good partners for some time, but there is a point of contention. Displax is making its own controller to enable multitouch skins that use the plastic film. The controller is sort of the brains that takes the signals from the film and translates them into input signals for a system. It's not a trivial thing, but the plastic film seems like the more interesting invention.

Cole said that Visual Planet is planning on doing its own controller to go with the plastic film. Hence, these two companies are kind of on a collision course. After Cole brought this up to us, a spokesman for Displax emailed the following message in response.

"We would like to clarify Displax' relationship with Visual Planet and its development of the multitouch technology launched at ISE. Displax Multitouch Technology is a technology solution. Displax is the developer of the unique multitouch controller that enables the detection and processing of multiple simultaneous signals from the foil and has several patents pending for this product. Visual Planet supplied the foil on which Displax built its prototype (unveiled at ISE) and is currently one of the foil suppliers that Displax is in discussions with to commercialize its technology. Displax has been happy with its professional dealings with Visual Planet and would be pleased to continue to work with this partner as one of its foil suppliers moving forwards. However, the company is continuing its discussions with other providers of this foil technology too. Displax still expects to ship its multitouch products in late second quarter/early third quarter 2010."

There you have it. If these companies can cooperate, then I suppose we'll see a very interesting technology hit the market by mid-year. But the picture is a little murkier than was related to me for the first story.



Visual Planet: http://www.visualplanet.biz

Displax: http://www.displax.com/index.php

Original Source: http://venturebeat.com/2010/02/08/displax-forgot-to-tell-us-it-doesnt-make-plastic-nanowire-film/